Science depends on open communication, at least in principle. But if you're working on the genetic basis of an epidemic, or the formula for an explosive, or whatever, do you have an obligation to NOT be open in what you say? For a current commentary, see Ehrlich, S. A. (2006). Balancing Communication and Safety. Science, 314(5804), 1387b-.
<http://sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/314/5804/1387b>
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment